I volunteered for a consortia sub-committee on “refreshing” the OPAC. Here is our charge:
The general scope of the project entails determining a new look and feel, color, and possibly some new navigation.
So, we are not going to be looking at designing a totally new OPAC through a vendor or open source, or how we can add more web 2.0 features. That will be coming later and I will also be a part of that project as well. This project will be about “putting lipstick on a pig”, as one of my colleagues stated: simply changing the look of some of the general search pages: homepage, advanced search, and maybe the bib record. We have quite an interesting bunch with a few reference people, serving graduate and undergraduate populations, a reserves person and our CLIC liaison, Deb, who will be doing these design changes for us. I am surprised that we did not get a few more people, representing the circulation and tech services folk. Mind you, I think this could be a good thing as we start to make more of a front end catalog. An interesting note is how some of the institutions use the catalog or how their students “enter” the catalog. Some have federated searching or a catalog search box on their homepages, where the student bypasses the catalog homepage and goes directly in to a bib record or a results list. At Hamline, we have the students go to the homepage first. This can obviously affect people’s perceptions of what should go where on the screen. Also, what people would like to discard, such as the subject search as a visible search option. I will be fighting against that one.
After our first meeting a few things became apparent in terms on likes and dislikes. Our catalog, CLICnet, needs softer colors, less horizontal lines, less redundancies, less clutter. In a sense, more stripped down and simple. We all pretty much liked what Cal Poly is doing with their catalog, which was just unveiled recently. Now, while they are just serving Cal Poly and we are serving a consortium, they do have several design features that are rather nice: color, less clutter and a second box for “See Also”, which we see as a place to relegate some of that clutter on our catalog page. I see this box being filled with links for ILL, other search features, other library catalogs, etc…
Now, this process is going to go pretty quick, that is, for consortia committees. We had our first meeting last week, a second meeting this week and then maybe one after that…and then our recommendations go to the full CLIC OPAC committee. One thing I do recognize with something like this is that it is hard to please everybody on the staff with new changes and when you multiply that by eight institutions (14 libraries) it gets even more daunting. And as I said before, that this is really the “start” of CLIC realizing that bigger changes are going to be coming soon for the catalog, it will be interesting to see what people want to “hold on to” and what they are willing to part with.

